2a3a110f00aacc09d8b8461bf90fda8b61d45fa1
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
9b795a25cd |
fix(pghero): update because CVE-2023-22626 (#23190)
There is a vulnerability [CVE-2023-22626](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vf99-xw26-86g5) ``` Name: pghero Version: 2.8.3 CVE: CVE-2023-22626 GHSA: GHSA-vf99-xw26-86g5 Criticality: High URL: https://github.com/ankane/pghero/issues/439 Title: Information Disclosure Through EXPLAIN Feature Solution: upgrade to '>= 3.1.0' ``` |
||
|
|
ae62e5fa53 |
Fix/remove calling private method with send in model (#22951)
* fix(status): remove send usage for private unlink_from_conversations - make unlink_from_conversations public method - rename unlink_from_conversations to unlink_from_conversations! - fix send call on private method in statuses_vacuum and batched_remove_status_service * fix(feeds_vacuum): replace find_in_batches with in_batches because active record query results should be a little more efficient than itterating with map and each. Postgres can grasp such lists of ids much quicker than ruby can. Will probably make allmost no difference, but cannot hurt either. |
||
|
|
19f78ea8fa |
linting: RuboCop update, config fixes (#20574)
* fix(rubocop): update gems and add performance and rspec fix(rubocop): update gems and add performance and rspec - update present rubocop gems - add rubocop-rspec and rubocop-performance gems - move rubocop gems to gem group :development, :test in order to make linting in a github action that runs with RAILS_ENV=test possible * feat(rubocop): disable some annoyance RSpec cops To mee these prooved to be more annoying than helpful. If not agreed, they can be enabled any time. * fix(rubocop): do not ignore spec/**/* Because rubocop-rspec should lint the specs as well, and they deserve to be readable in general. It is relevant code, after all. * fix(rubocop): change ignore db/**/* to db/schema.rb because rails cops do some lints for migrations. E.g. reversable migrations linting and more. * fix(rubocop): tune rules configs Bunch of commits squashed: fix(rubocop): enable Layout/LineLength cop Because this project has code with line lenghts > 500 chars. This is not good practice at all, so I strongly suggest to change the practice in the future. But allow heredoc, URI and comments to still be long lines and make the default Max: 120 explicit, by repeating it in the config. To me this max length seems reasonable. Perhaps a bit more could be ok for some. But > 500 chars in one line Seems to be way too long IMHO. fix(rubocop): Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity Max to 12 The default is 7, perhaps quite strict. But 25 is too loose, the rule becomes pointless like that. fix(rubocop): AllCops ruby version, cacheing and more info - fix the target ruby version from 2.5 to 3.0 - have the cop error messages to be more informative and helpful - enable cacheing in /tmp fix(rubocop): Metrics/AbcSize to 34 from 115 Rubocops default is 17. If the rule is at 115 is becomes pointless. fix(rubocop): Metrics/BlockLength improvements - instead of ignoring tasks completely, ignore only the long blocks that are specific to tasks (task, namespace) - ignore also concern specific block methods (included, class_methods) fix(rubocop): Metrics/ClassLength count heredoc array as one line fix(rubocop): Metrics/MethodLength Max to 25 - the default is 10, but 65 is too loose, so perhaps 25? fix(rubocop): Metrics/ModuleLength array and heredoc count as one fix(rubocop): Metrics/PerceivedComplexity to 16 from 25 Rubocops default is 8, so how about only doubling that, instead of > than tripple it? fix(rubocop): enable Style/RedundantAssignment Because I think that this rule would never really hurt, but improve code quality and readability. fix(rubocop): enable Style/RescueStandardError I think everyone that ever had to debug what this can bring will hopefully agree that this rule totally makes sense. In the super rare exeptions where this is totally needed, it can be excluded by disabling comment in that place. fix(rubocop): Metrics/ParameterLists add explicit defaults and some excludes |
||
|
|
47f0d7021e |
refactor(vacuum statuses): reduce amount of db queries and load for each query - improve performance (#21487)
* refactor(statuses_vacuum): remove dead code - unused
Method is not called inside class and private.
Clean up dead code.
* refactor(statuses_vacuum): make retention_period present test explicit
This private method only hides functionality.
It is best practice to be as explicit as possible.
* refactor(statuses_vacuum): improve query performance
- fix statuses_scope having sub-select for Account.remote scope by
`joins(:account).merge(Account.remote)`
- fix statuses_scope unnecessary use of `Status.arel_table[:id].lt`
because it is inexplicit, bad practice and even slower than normal
`.where('statuses.id < ?'`
- fix statuses_scope remove select(:id, :visibility) for having reusable
active record query batches (no re queries)
- fix vacuum_statuses! to use in_batches instead of find_in_batches,
because in_batches delivers a full blown active record query result,
in stead of an array - no requeries necessary
- send(:unlink_from_conversations) not to perform another db query, but
reuse the in_batches result instead.
- remove now obsolete remove_from_account_conversations method
- remove_from_search_index uses array of ids, instead of mapping
the ids from an array - this should be more efficient
- use the in_batches scope to call delete_all, instead of running
another db query for this - because it is again more efficient
- add TODO comment for calling models private method with send
* refactor(status): simplify unlink_from_conversations
- add `has_many through:` relation mentioned_accounts
- use model scope local instead of method call `Status#local?`
- more readable add account to inbox_owners when account.local?
* refactor(status): searchable_by way less sub selects
These queries all included a sub-select. Doing the same with a joins
should be more efficient.
Since this method does 5 such queries, this should be significant,
since it technically halves the query count.
This is how it was:
```ruby
[3] pry(main)> Status.first.mentions.where(account: Account.local, silent: false).explain
Status Load (1.6ms) SELECT "statuses".* FROM "statuses" WHERE "statuses"."deleted_at" IS NULL ORDER BY "statuses"."id" DESC LIMIT $1 [["LIMIT", 1]]
Mention Load (1.5ms) SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "mentions"."account_id" IN (SELECT "accounts"."id" FROM "accounts" WHERE "accounts"."domain" IS NULL) AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
=> EXPLAIN for: SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "mentions"."account_id" IN (SELECT "accounts"."id" FROM "accounts" WHERE "accounts"."domain" IS NULL) AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop (cost=0.15..23.08 rows=1 width=41)
-> Seq Scan on accounts (cost=0.00..10.90 rows=1 width=8)
Filter: (domain IS NULL)
-> Index Scan using index_mentions_on_account_id_and_status_id on mentions (cost=0.15..8.17 rows=1 width=41)
Index Cond: ((account_id = accounts.id) AND (status_id = '109382923142288414'::bigint))
Filter: (NOT silent)
(6 rows)
```
This is how it is with this change:
```ruby
[4] pry(main)> Status.first.mentions.joins(:account).merge(Account.local).active.explain
Status Load (1.7ms) SELECT "statuses".* FROM "statuses" WHERE "statuses"."deleted_at" IS NULL ORDER BY "statuses"."id" DESC LIMIT $1 [["LIMIT", 1]]
Mention Load (0.7ms) SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" INNER JOIN "accounts" ON "accounts"."id" = "mentions"."account_id" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "accounts"."domain" IS NULL AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
=> EXPLAIN for: SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" INNER JOIN "accounts" ON "accounts"."id" = "mentions"."account_id" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "accounts"."domain" IS NULL AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop (cost=0.15..23.08 rows=1 width=41)
-> Seq Scan on accounts (cost=0.00..10.90 rows=1 width=8)
Filter: (domain IS NULL)
-> Index Scan using index_mentions_on_account_id_and_status_id on mentions (cost=0.15..8.17 rows=1 width=41)
Index Cond: ((account_id = accounts.id) AND (status_id = '109382923142288414'::bigint))
Filter: (NOT silent)
(6 rows)
```
|