Conflicts:
- `app/services/post_status_service.rb`:
Upstream added a line adjacent to one that had been modified due to local-only posting.
Added upstream's change.
- `tsconfig.json`:
Upstream updated Typescript and updated `tsconfig` in the process by changing paths, where
glitch-soc had extra paths. Updated as upstream did.
* [Glitch] Fix undefined `current_flavour` in controllers
After the theming infrastructure migration (#37612, #37807),
`ThemingConcern` was removed and theme-related methods were moved
to `ThemeHelper`. However, controllers like `Settings::FlavoursController`
call `current_flavour` directly in their actions, which is not accessible
from a view helper module.
Include `ThemeHelper` in `ApplicationController` to restore access to
`current_flavour`, `current_skin`, `current_theme`, and other theme
methods in all controllers.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Include ThemeHelper in Settings::FlavoursController instead of ApplicationController
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Conflicts:
- `app/views/settings/preferences/other/show.html.haml`:
Upstream moved some preferences to a new category, while glitch-soc had an
extra preference there.
Moved the extra preference like upstream did to the new category.
Conflicts:
- `config/settings.yml`:
Not a real conflict, upstream removed settings that are identical in glitch-soc
but textually adjacent to glitch-soc-only settings.
Removed what upstream removed.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/trends/statuses.rb`:
Conflict because of glitch-soc's setting to allow CWs in trends.
Kept glitch-soc's setting but followed upstream's refactor.
- `docker-compose.yml`:
Conflict because of upstream VS glitch-soc repos.
Updated version number as upstream did, but kept glitch-soc repos.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-nightly.yml`:
We had modified the file to disable the custom ARM64 builder.
Upstream has removed it, using github's runners.
Took upstream's changes.
- `.github/workflows/build-push-pr.yml`:
We had modified the file to disable the custom ARM64 builder.
Upstream has removed it, using github's runners.
Took upstream's changes.
- `.github/workflows/build-releases.yml`:
We had modified the file to disable the custom ARM64 builder.
Upstream has removed it, using github's runners.
Took upstream's changes.
- `.github/workflows/build-security.yml`:
We had modified the file to disable the custom ARM64 builder.
Upstream has removed it, using github's runners.
Took upstream's changes.
Conflicts:
- `spec/system/settings/preferences/appearance_spec.rb`:
Upstream tests for changing themes in there, but glitch-soc has
its own place for that.
Updated upstream's change while skipping the theme test.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/trends/statuses.rb`:
Upstream added a date restriction to trendable posts, while glitch-soc had
slightly different conditions.
Added the date restriction to glitch-soc's conditions.
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Upstream added a helper where glitch-soc had its own, not really
a conflict.
Added upstream's helper.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream renamed a constant that was used slightly differently in glitch-soc.
Renamed it as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Upstream reworked how CSS classes for the document's body are computed.
Slight conflict due to glitch-soc's different theming system.
Updated as upstream did.
